EU Circular Economy Act: what fashion brands need to know

What Is the EU Circular Economy Act? A Fashion Brand’s Guide to What’s Coming

The EU Circular Economy Act is not just another regulation to monitor, it is the legislative architecture that will define how fashion brands design, sell, and account for their products in the years ahead.

The Problem With How the Industry Is Watching This

Most fashion brands are watching the European regulatory landscape the same way they watch a slow-moving train: they know it is coming, they can see it, they just have not decided to step off the tracks yet.

The EU Circular Economy Act is due for adoption in 2026. It is not a vague aspirational document. It is a binding legislative framework designed to fundamentally restructure how materials enter, circulate within, and exit the European economy. And fashion, one of the most resource-intensive sectors on the planet, is squarely in its scope.

The EU’s circularity rate currently sits at around 12%. The goal is to double it to 24% by 2030. That gap does not close on its own. It closes through exactly the kind of binding legislation that the Circular Economy Act is intended to introduce.

This article explains what the Act is, where it comes from, how it connects to existing regulations that are already in force, and what fashion brands operating in Europe should be doing right now. I am not writing this as a lawyer or a policy analyst. I am writing it as someone embedded in the operational realities of building circular fashion systems, because I think the industry still underestimates how much ground-level work this transition requires.

What the Circular Economy Act Actually Is

Let us be precise about terminology, because a lot of content about this topic blends together concepts that are distinct.

The Circular Economy Act is an upcoming piece of EU legislation, currently expected to be adopted in 2026. It is not yet law. It is in preparation. In August 2025, the European Commission launched a public consultation on the Act. That consultation is part of the formal process that precedes legislative adoption.

The Act will not appear from nowhere. It is the next legislative step in a long-running EU policy trajectory that started formally with the first Circular Economy Action Plan in 2015 and was significantly expanded with the second Circular Economy Action Plan, adopted in March 2020 as part of the European Green Deal.

The Circular Economy Act is designed to build on that second Action Plan, reinforcing and broadening its measures to accelerate Europe’s shift toward a resource-efficient, low-waste, and climate-neutral economy.

So when you hear about the Circular Economy Act, you are hearing about the culmination of a policy process that has been building for a decade. The regulations that are already in force, ESPR, the Right to Repair Directive, EPR for textiles, the Packaging Regulation, are not separate stories. They are the early chapters of the same book.

The Core Goal: A Single Market for Secondary Materials

One of the most concrete objectives of the upcoming Act is establishing what the Commission calls a Single Market for secondary raw materials. This is more significant than it might sound.

Right now, recycled materials in Europe are fragmented across national markets, subject to inconsistent quality standards, and difficult to trade across borders. A brand trying to source certified recycled fibres for their next collection faces a patchwork of certifications, supplier claims, and documentation that varies depending on which country those materials came from.

The Act aims to increase the supply of high-quality recycled materials and stimulate demand for these materials within the EU. For fashion brands, this has a direct operational implication: within a few years, sourcing recycled input materials will be easier, more standardised, and more verifiable, but brands will also be expected to prove they are actually using them.

Where Fashion Sits in This Regulatory Architecture

Fashion is not incidental to the Circular Economy Act. It is one of the central sectors the EU has identified for transformation.

EU consumption of textiles has, on average, the fourth highest impact on the environment and climate change, after food, housing and mobility. It is also the third highest area of consumption for water and land use, and fifth highest for the use of primary raw materials and greenhouse gas emissions.

These numbers are not rhetorical. They are the basis on which the EU has decided that textiles require specific, sector-targeted legislation, not just general circular economy principles applied loosely.

The EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles was adopted in March 2022. That strategy is the fashion-specific expression of the broader Circular Economy Action Plan. It defines the 2030 vision for textiles and sets out the legislative actions needed to reach it.

The strategy’s 2030 vision states that all textile products placed on the EU market should be durable, repairable, recyclable, and, to a great extent, made of recycled fibres, free of hazardous substances, and produced in respect of social rights and the environment.

This is not aspirational language. It will be implemented through binding regulation, primarily through the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), which is already in force, and through the product-specific delegated acts that will follow.

The Regulations Already in Force That Fashion Brands Should Know

This is where many brands underestimate the real work. The Circular Economy Act is coming in 2026, but the regulatory environment is not waiting for it. Multiple major pieces of legislation are already in effect or in advanced stages of adoption.

ESPR: Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation

The ESPR entered into force in July 2024. This is the cornerstone regulation. It gives the European Commission the authority to set ecodesign requirements for product categories, including textiles, covering durability, repairability, recyclability, recycled content, and the presence of hazardous substances.

Crucially, the ESPR also mandates the introduction of Digital Product Passports (DPPs) for regulated product categories. The DPP is a structured digital record attached to a product, typically via a QR code or similar identifier, that carries verified information about its materials, composition, origin, repair options, and end-of-life handling.

Textiles are among the first product categories for which DPP requirements are being developed. The exact technical specifications are still being finalised through delegated acts, but the direction is clear and the timeline is tightening.

The Right to Repair Directive

The Directive establishing the right to repair entered into force in July 2024. While its initial scope is focused on specific product categories like electronics and appliances, the principle it establishes, that consumers have the right to have their goods repaired rather than replaced, is directly relevant to fashion. Brands that design for durability and offer repair services are ahead of where regulation is heading.

Extended Producer Responsibility for Textiles

Extended Producer Responsibility, or EPR, is a principle that places the financial and operational burden of end-of-life product management on the producers who put products on the market, not on municipalities or consumers.

The EU proposed mandatory and harmonised EPR schemes for textiles in all Member States through a revision of the Waste Framework Directive. The revised Waste Framework Directive entered into force in October 2025.

What this means operationally: fashion brands selling into EU markets will increasingly be required to contribute to the collection, sorting, and recycling of the garments they produce. The days of selling a product and walking away from it at end of life are ending.

The Ban on Destroying Unsold Goods

This is one of the most directly operational provisions to come out of the EU Textiles Strategy. The ban on destroying unsold textiles and footwear begins for large enterprises from July 2026, and extends to medium-sized enterprises from July 2030.

For large brands that routinely destroy excess inventory to protect brand value, this represents a fundamental shift in operational practice. For smaller brands, the timeline is longer, but the direction is the same.

The Green Claims Directive

In March 2023, the Commission submitted a proposal for a Directive on substantiating green claims. This Directive, once adopted, will require brands to back up any environmental marketing claims, whether about recycled content, carbon footprint, or circularity, with verified evidence. Vague claims like “sustainable”, “eco-friendly”, or “conscious” without substantiation will be prohibited.

This has immediate implications for brand communications. If you are making environmental claims on your website, your labels, or your social media, you need to be building the evidentiary infrastructure to support them now.

What the Circular Economy Act Will Add

Given the regulations already in force, what will the Circular Economy Act add?

Based on the Commission’s stated objectives and the public consultation launched in 2025, the Act is expected to:

Consolidate and strengthen existing measures. Several directives and regulations that have been introduced in recent years will be reinforced and given a clearer legislative home under a single framework act.

Create binding targets for circularity rates. The goal is to double Europe’s circularity rate from 12% to 24% by 2030, as part of the EU’s Clean Industrial Deal. The Act is expected to give this target binding legal weight.

Establish the Single Market for secondary raw materials. This includes quality standards for recycled materials, interoperability between national recycling systems, and mechanisms to stimulate demand for secondary materials on the EU market.

Revise the WEEE Directive. The Commission has evaluated the Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and will use the findings to inform a proposal to revise it, as part of the upcoming Circular Economy Act. While WEEE is primarily about electronics, the methodology of producer responsibility embedded in that directive is directly analogous to what is being built for textiles.

Embed interoperability requirements. For DPPs and product data systems to function at scale, data needs to flow between platforms, between supply chain actors, and between national registries. The Act is expected to address this at a structural level.

I want to flag something here: the precise scope of the Act is still being shaped. The public consultation that closed in late 2025 will inform its final form. Anyone claiming to know exactly what it will contain is ahead of the evidence. What we do know is the direction, the ambition, and the legislative tools the Commission is working with. That is enough to act on.

The Supply Chain Data Problem No One Is Solving Fast Enough

Here is the tension I keep observing: brands understand the regulatory landscape at a high level, but they consistently underestimate the operational complexity of meeting it.

The Circular Economy Act, and the ESPR delegated acts for textiles that will precede it, will require fashion brands to know things about their products that most brands currently cannot answer quickly or reliably:

What fibres is this garment made from, exactly, at what percentages?
Where were those raw materials sourced?
Which factory produced the fabric? Which produced the finished garment?
What certifications cover those materials and processes?
Can this garment be recycled at end of life? Through which mechanism?
What chemicals or finishes were applied during production?

Most fashion brands do not have this data in a structured, verifiable, and retrievable format, understanding what data is required is a practical starting point. They have it in scattered spreadsheets, supplier portals, PDF certificates, and email threads. That is not the same thing.

The Digital Product Passport is not just a QR code you attach to a label. It is the visible output of an underlying data infrastructure that must exist across your entire supply chain. The QR code is easy. The data behind it is where the real work lives.

I think the industry is still treating DPP and circular economy compliance as a documentation problem, when in reality it is also a systems problem. The regulations assume that brands know what is in their products. Most brands need to work urgently to make that true.

What Fashion Brands Should Do Now

The Circular Economy Act is not yet law. But the broader regulatory architecture it sits within is already in motion. Here is where to focus your energy.

Audit Your Current Data Reality

Before you can comply, you need to know where you stand. Run an honest audit of what product data you actually hold: fibre composition, supplier names, country of origin, certifications, chemical inputs, and end-of-life options. Identify the gaps. Most brands find these gaps are larger than expected.

Engage Your Suppliers on Data

The data you need does not live in your own systems. It lives with your fabric mills, your garment factories, your dye houses, and your trims suppliers. Start building the processes and relationships that allow you to collect structured, verifiable data from them systematically. This cannot be done in a rush at the point of compliance deadline.

Review Your Green Claims

With the Green Claims Directive in development and national consumer protection authorities already beginning to act on greenwashing cases, any environmental claim you make should be backed by evidence you can actually produce. If you cannot substantiate a claim today, stop making it until you can.

Start Building or Selecting Your DPP Infrastructure

You do not need a finalised DPP technical specification to start preparing. You need a system that can hold product-level data in a structured format, connect it to a physical identifier, and update it over time as products move through resale, repair, or recycling. Our DPP regulation guide covers the full framework. Start evaluating tools and approaches now rather than when compliance pressure peaks.

Understand Your EPR Obligations

If you sell significant volumes into EU markets, particularly France, which has had textile EPR in place since 2022, and other Member States where harmonised schemes are now being introduced, you need to understand your registration and reporting obligations. This is not future speculation. It is current operational reality in several markets.

Do Not Wait for Perfect Regulatory Clarity

The regulations are still evolving. The Circular Economy Act’s final form is not yet settled. But waiting for perfect clarity is a mistake. The direction is clear enough to act on. Brands that start building data infrastructure, supplier relationships, and circular business models now will find compliance easier, less expensive, and more strategically valuable than those who treat it as a last-minute task.

The Bigger Picture: Circularity as Competitive Advantage

I want to close this section with a thought that is easy to lose in the compliance conversation.

The EU is not only regulating toward a circular economy because of environmental ideals. The Competitiveness Compass frames the goal of making the EU the world leader in the circular economy by 2030 explicitly as a competitive ambition. Circularity is being built into European industrial policy as a strategic differentiator, a way to reduce dependence on imported raw materials, create local jobs in repair and reuse, and build industries that are more resilient to global supply chain shocks.

For every 1000 tonnes of textiles collected for reuse, between 20 and 35 jobs are created. The EU sees circular textiles not only as an environmental goal but as an economic development opportunity.

Fashion brands that align with this direction, that build genuinely circular products, services, and supply chains, will not just be compliant. They will be commercially better positioned in a market that is structurally moving toward valuing exactly what they offer.

FAQ

What is the EU Circular Economy Act?

The EU Circular Economy Act is an upcoming piece of European legislation, expected to be adopted in 2026. It aims to establish a Single Market for secondary raw materials, double Europe’s circularity rate from 12% to 24% by 2030, and build on the regulatory framework introduced by the second Circular Economy Action Plan of 2020. A public consultation on the Act was launched by the European Commission in August 2025.

Is the Circular Economy Act already in force?

No. As of early 2026, the Circular Economy Act has not yet been adopted. It is in the preparation and consultation phase. However, multiple regulations that will feed into or be consolidated under the Act, including the ESPR, the Right to Repair Directive, the revised Waste Framework Directive, and the Packaging Regulation, are already in force.

How does the Circular Economy Act affect fashion brands?

Fashion brands are directly affected through several channels: mandatory ecodesign requirements via the ESPR, Digital Product Passport obligations for textiles, Extended Producer Responsibility for end-of-life garment management, the ban on destroying unsold textile goods, and substantiation requirements for environmental claims under the Green Claims Directive.

What is the connection between the Circular Economy Act and the Digital Product Passport?

The Digital Product Passport (DPP) is a central tool through which the EU intends to implement product transparency and circularity requirements. The ESPR, which is already in force, mandates DPPs for regulated product categories including textiles. The Circular Economy Act will reinforce and potentially extend the DPP framework, with a focus on ensuring data interoperability and portability across systems and borders.

When does the ban on destroying unsold fashion goods come into force?

For large enterprises, the ban on destroying unsold textiles and footwear begins in July 2026. For medium-sized enterprises, it begins in July 2030. Small enterprises may be exempt or subject to later timelines, though this is still subject to regulatory finalisation.

What is Extended Producer Responsibility for textiles?

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) requires fashion brands and textile producers to take financial and operational responsibility for the end-of-life management of the garments they put on the market. This includes contributing to collection, sorting, and recycling infrastructure. Mandatory harmonised EPR schemes for textiles across all EU Member States are being introduced through the revised Waste Framework Directive, which entered into force in October 2025.

What is the EU Textiles Strategy and how does it relate to the Circular Economy Act?

The EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles was adopted in March 2022. It is the fashion-specific implementation framework within the broader Circular Economy Action Plan. The Textiles Strategy defines the 2030 vision for the sector and sets out the legislative actions needed to achieve it. The Circular Economy Act will provide the broader legislative architecture within which textile-specific regulations sit.

Do small fashion brands need to worry about the Circular Economy Act?

Yes, though the timelines and thresholds for some obligations vary by company size. Small brands selling into EU markets will be subject to DPP requirements once textile-specific delegated acts are finalised under the ESPR, and will need to comply with Green Claims requirements regardless of size. EPR obligations and the unsold goods destruction ban have longer timelines for smaller operators, but the direction of travel is the same for all brands.

Conclusion

The Circular Economy Act is not a single event. It is the next formal step in a regulatory transformation that has been underway for years and will continue well into the 2030s.

Fashion brands operating in Europe are not facing a future compliance problem. They are facing a present operational one. The data, systems, supplier relationships, and circular business models that will be required for compliance are things that take time to build, more time, in most cases, than the regulatory deadlines will allow if brands wait too long to begin.

The rules are still being finalised. The technical specifications are still being written. That uncertainty is real, and it is fair to acknowledge it. But uncertainty about the precise shape of the Act is not a reason to wait. The direction is clear. The ambition is binding. And the brands that treat circularity as a strategic priority rather than a compliance checkbox will find themselves better positioned, commercially, operationally, and reputationally, as this regulatory architecture fully takes shape.

We do not need perfect clarity on day one. We need structured, honest progress.

Sources

European Commission, Circular Economy Strategy page: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/circular-economy_en
European Commission, EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/textiles-strategy_en
European Commission, Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR): https://commission.europa.eu/energy-climate-change-environment/standards-tools-and-labels/products-labelling-rules-and-requirements/ecodesign-sustainable-products-regulation_en
European Commission, Second Circular Economy Action Plan (2020): https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN
European Commission, Directive on the Right to Repair (2024): https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024L1799
European Commission, Competitiveness Compass: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_339
European Commission, Clean Industrial Deal: https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/clean-industrial-deal_en

This article has been reviewed for accuracy by the Wetrack team.
Some illustrations may be AI-generated in which case they are labeled. Report any issue.